Reading the discussions between the two 9/11 Scholars groups helped me to identify who was honestly seeking the truth about 9/11, and who was trying to obfuscate the issues and promoting false theories as science:
*Jim Hoffman: A Critical Review of Morgan Reynolds' Why Did the Trade Center Skyscrapers Collapse? (June 2005)
*Morgan Reynolds: Revisiting the WTC Building Collapses (July 2005)
*Steven Jones: Why Indeed Did the World Trade Center Buildings Completely Collapse? (September 2005)
*Judy Wood and Michael Zebuhr: Aluminum Glows (March 2006)
*Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds: Why indeed did the WTC Buildings Disintegrate? (August 2006)
*Steven Jones: Applying the scientific method (November 2006, updated April 2007)
*Judy Wood and Morgan Reynolds: The Scientific Method applied to the Thermite Hypothesis (December 2006)
*Gregory Jenkins: The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center (February 2007)
*Stephen Phillips: A Physicist Critiques Steven Jones' New Paper (May 2007)
Some wider reading revealed the prevalence, and effects, of misinformation in the 9/11 Truth Movement:
*Jim Hoffman: The Pentagon No-757-Crash Theory: Booby Trap for 9/11 Skeptics (November 2004)
*Jeremy Baker: 9/11 - In Plane Site: A Critical Review (2004)
*Michael Green: Loose Change First Edition: An Analysis (August 2005)
*Michael Green: The Company We Keep (February 2006)
*Jim Hoffman: ScholarsFor911Truth.org: Muddling the Evidence (February 2006)
*Jim Hoffman: Sifting Through Loose Change (2006)
*Joseph Firmage: Intersecting Facts and Theories on 9/11 (August 2006)
*Eric Salter: A Critical Review of WTC "No Plane" Theories (October 2006)
*The "Patriots and 9/11" Trap
*Arabesque: The Pentagon Honey Pot (July 2007)
*Victoria Ashley Discrediting By Association: Undermining the Case for Patriots Who Question 9/11 (August 2007)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment