Given the way that the Bush Administration and other governments have used the 9/11 attacks for their own political agendas, it might be thought that proof of who was responsible for the attacks themselves would be ironclad. However, this is not the case. On the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" appears the name of Osama Bin Laden; however he is apparently not wanted for crimes connected with 9/11, only for smaller attacks carried out in the 1990's. When asked why this is the case, an FBI spokesman stated that "The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Osama Bin Laden with 9/11".
A promised white paper detailing the case against Bin Laden was never produced. The UK government did produce such a paper, but noted that the evidence they had was not strong enough to win a case in court against Bin Laden. In other words, while the evidence is strong enough to go to war, it is not strong enough to go to court.
(To be expanded)
Next Chapter: The Evidence of 9/11
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment